Pollock v. Martin Gauge Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
-Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the East-, ern Division of the Northern District of Illinois. Suit by the Martin Gauge Company against Albert E. Pollock and others. From the decree (251 Fed. 295), which granted part only of the relief sought, defendant appeals, and complainant also appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, Circuit Judge.
[1] The opinion of the District Judge, appearing in 251 Fed. 295, fully and accurately describes the patent in suit, sets forth the issues in controversy in No. 2641, and the various contentions in support of them, and relieves us of the necessity of stating them. We are in accord with the views expressed in that opinion and agree with the conclusions there reached-. We therefore adopt the opinion of the District Court.
Patent No. 1,220,272 is valid and infringed.
The Martin Gauge Company has, likewise, appealed from the decree, assigning as error the court’s refusal to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Martin Gauge Co. v. PollockDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1918
3Cited by8 opinions
- Robert Bosch, Llc v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Pyle Nat. Co. v. LewinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- McCulloch Motors Corp. v. Oregon Saw Chain Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1965
- Standard Oil Co. v. Roxana Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1925
- Collins v. KraftDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.