Legal Opinion
Tyson v. Hess
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 17, 1985PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*945OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Whether or not there was a valid contract of employment— a question we need not reach — as an unclassified employee petitioner was not in any event entitled to a pretermination hearing under Civil Service Law § 75. As for her constitutional right, "all the process that is due is provided by a pretermination opportunity to respond, coupled with posttermination” review procedures (Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v Loudermill, 470 US —, —, 105 S Ct 1487, 1496). Petitioner does not dispute that she was given…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
3Cited by16 opinions
- Tarr v. Credit Suisse Asset Management, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Gregory Heinrichs v. Marshall and Stevens IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Mastrangelo v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Levey v. A. Leventhal & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Massaria v. BetschenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.