Ratliff v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKiNNey
Plaintiff in error has appealed to this conrt from a conviction for forgery, his term of imprisonment having been fixed at a year and a day in the State penitentiary. It is his contention that the evidence does not support the verdict, the State having failed to prove that he forged the involved instrument as well as an intention to defraud.
The alleged forged check is as follows:
“Kingsport, Tenn., 7-16-1938 “The First National Bank
“Pay to the order of Garland Store $12.00 Twelve dollars Dollars
“Oscar McMurray”
Oscar McMurray testified that he did not execute said check nor authorize anyone…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hobbs v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- State v. WaterburySupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- State v. BeasleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- Girdley v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. JamesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
- McGhee v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1945
- State v. RounsavilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1985