Legal Opinion
Schulman Investment Co. v. Olin Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 17, 1978No. 78 Civ. 176 (CHT)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TENNEY, District Judge.
In this action, third-party defendant Haber & Henry, Inc. (“H & H”) moves pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 3 (“the Act”), for a stay of proceedings against it pending arbitration. In the original diversity suit, Schulman Investment Company (“Schulman”), a New York partnership, sued Olin Corporation (“Olin”), a foreign corporation authorized to do busi ness in New York, for breach of contract, breach of warranty, and negligence, the controversy growing out of work performed under a building construction subcontract. Olin in turn filed a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Almacenes Fernandez, S. A. v. GolodetzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- C. Itoh & Co. (America) Inc., a New York Corporation v. The Jordan International CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Acevedo Maldonado v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,309 Clarance B. Dickinson, a v. Heinold Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Ex Parte Costa and Head (Atrium), Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Cibro Petroleum Products, Inc. v. City of Albany (In Re Winimo Realty Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Post Tensioned Engineering Corp. v. Fairways Plaza AssociatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc. v. Richal Shipping Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.