Lyon v. Phillips
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtBevy, J.
(after stating the facts as above). The appellants asked and the court, refused to give a peremptory instruction to the jury, and it is insisted that the ruling of the court was erroneous because the evidence conclusively established that the deceased was guilty of such contributory negligence as would bar a recovery in the case. In the circumstances it may not be said, it is thought, that it conclusively appears that Collins and the deceased were aware of the approach of the train at a time before they reached the storehouse. It does appear, though, that the headlight of the engine shone…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Suderman Dolson v. Harman KrigerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Garteiser v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1893
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. MaddinTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Davis v. PettittTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- City of Uvalde v. StovallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Texas & N. O. R. v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.