Legal Opinion

State v. Neal

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 28, 1988No. 62,042PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Herd, J.:

This is an appeal by the State, pursuant to K.S.A. 1987 Supp. 22-3602(b)(4), from the trial court’s order granting a new trial to defendant Michael Neal following his convictions of felony theft, K.S.A. 1987 Supp. 21-3701, and aggravated robbery, K.S.A. 21-3427. The trial court ordered a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence, pursuant to K.S.A. 22-3501(1). The sole issue on appeal is whether the court abused its discretion in granting the new trial. We affirm.

The events leading to Neal’s conviction are as follows. A woman in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ArneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  2. State v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  3. Hornback v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Rld. Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. State v. RedfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API