Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Hammer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 5, 1998, which, inter alia, reduced claimant’s weekly unemployment insurance benefit rate to zero.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reducing claimant’s benefit rate to zero. The record establishes that claimant’s pension was totally funded by his employer and that the amount of his pension payments exceeded the maximum weekly unemployment benefit rate of $300 (see, Labor Law § 590 [5]). Accordingly, claimant’s unemployment insurance benefits were properly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of LevinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. In re the Claim of De SalvoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claim of PinezicAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re HosenfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. In re the Claim of SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Matter of Johnson (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  4. Matter of Morganstern (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API