In re Hosenfeld
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 22, 1999, which charged claimant with a recoverable overpayment of unemployment insurance benefits.
We find no reason to disturb the finding of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board charging claimant with a recoverable overpayment of benefits totaling $547.50 (see, Matter of Hammer [Commissioner of Labor], 263 AD2d 608; Matter of Chriscaden [Sweeney], 232 AD2d 803, 806). The record establishes that claimant began receiving his employer-funded pension from the Sheet Metal Workers’ Union on May 1, 1999.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Claim of ChriscadenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re the Claim of HammerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Claim of ConroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Matter of Johnson (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022