Legal Opinion

In re Hosenfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 1, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 22, 1999, which charged claimant with a recoverable overpayment of unemployment insurance benefits.

We find no reason to disturb the finding of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board charging claimant with a recoverable overpayment of benefits totaling $547.50 (see, Matter of Hammer [Commissioner of Labor], 263 AD2d 608; Matter of Chriscaden [Sweeney], 232 AD2d 803, 806). The record establishes that claimant began receiving his employer-funded pension from the Sheet Metal Workers’ Union on May 1, 1999.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of ChriscadenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. In re the Claim of HammerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of ConroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. In re the Claim of SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Matter of Johnson (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API