Pringle v. Modern Woodmen of America
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Deuel county: Hanson M. Grimes, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Ames, C.
There is no conflict in the evidence with respect to the facts essential to the determination of the rights of the parties to this action which was tried by the court alone, a jury having been waived.
Frank W. Pringle was a member of the defendant society holding a beneficiary certificate in favor of his mother, the plaintiff, which contained a clause to the effect that it shall become null and void if, while such a 'member, he should become convicted of a felony. While such member he was' convicted of a felony, in consequence of which he was sentenced to serve a term in the Nebraska…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Knights of Pythias v. KalinskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Supreme Lodge, Knights of Honor v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
- Trotter v. Grand Lodge of the Iowa Legion of HonorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Coverdale v. Royal ArcanumIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Modern Woodmen of America v. ColmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Peebles v. Eminent Household of Columbian WoodmenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Sovereign Camp of Woodmen of the World v. LathamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Independent Order of Foresters v. CunninghamTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
- Rasicot v. Royal Neighbors of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
- Thomas v. Modern Brotherhood of AmericaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.