Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nichols v. Levy

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 26, 1931No. 22173Published

1DissentKornegay, J.

I cannot agree with the. reasoning in the majority opinion in this case. Owing to the importance and far-reaching effect of the decision, depending upon the written law, and not questions of fact, I feel it my duty to state my reasons for dissent in writing, instead of registering a simple conference protest.

The circumstances out of which the litigation arises are that the Legislature of the state, at the last session, passed a law providing for the appointment of an additional county judge for Oklahoma county, and the act was approved by the Governor of the state. The party appointed by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. RitterbuschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Dancy v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Childs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Levine v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Leiber, Justice of the Peace v. ArgaubrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API