Legal Opinion
Shoemaker v. Shoemaker
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 30, 1951PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
11 N.J. Super. 471 (1951)
78 A.2d 605
JOHN SHOEMAKER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
GEORGE SHOEMAKER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND MARY SHOEMAKER, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 15, 1951.
Decided January 30, 1951.
Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and WM. J. BRENNAN, JR.
Mr. Morris Spritzer argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Charles Schwartzman, attorney).
Mr. Horace E. Bunker argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Bunker & Elliott, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, JR., J.A.D.
The defendant, George Shoemaker,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stein v. SchmitzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
- Vladar v. KlopmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916
- Apgar v. WoolstonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1881
- Evans v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
- Magowan v. RickeySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Devlin v. GreinerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Banks v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Fleming v. UPSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- George H. Galbraith and Rose T. Galbraith, His Wife v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.