Legal Opinion

United States v. Griffin

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided February 25, 1977No. SPCM 12355PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

COSTELLO, Judge:

The principal contention before us is that the record of trial was not properly authenticated because the trial counsel acted as the authenticating officer in violation of the rule in United States v. Cruz-Rijos, 24 U.S.C.M.A. 271, 51 C.M.R. 723, 1 M.J. 429 (1976). Trial counsel acted at Fort Lewis, Washington, on 28 July 1976, the same date on which the trial judge arrived *554at his new station in Georgia. The trial judge had been routinely transferred from one Army judicial circuit to another pursuant to competent military orders. In these circumstances, we…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Cruz-RijosUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. BuntingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. SimsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  4. United States v. SnookUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  5. United States v. WilsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. AndradeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977
  2. United States v. ZilchU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API