Ex Parte Davila
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
OPINION
ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
ROBERTS, Judge.
In its motion for rehearing the State presents three contentions: that the trial court’s fact-finding as to the complainant’s age is unsupported by the record; that there is insufficient evidence in this record to determine whether the petitioner was entitled to relief; and that by granting relief this Court has, for the first time, allowed a successful collateral attack upon the sufficiency of the evidence. We reject all of these contentions.
Concerning the first two contentions, the State argues that since there was no hearing on this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McCloud v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Mears v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.