Wilson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ONION, Presiding Judge.
This appeal is from a conviction of delivery of marihuana. Punishment was assessed by the jury at ten (10) years in the Texas Department of Corrections.
The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged.
At the outset appellant complains that the trial court erred in denying his motion to quash the indictment which, omitting the formal parts, alleged that he “did then and there knowlingly and intentionally deliver to W. D. West a controlled substance, namely: Marihuana. . . . ”
Among other things, the said motion to quash alleged the indictment did not allege an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Standley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Pope v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Voelkel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Gaines v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Fisher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Eastep v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Benoit v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.