Legal Opinion
Palm Manor Nursing Home, Inc. v. Rate Setting Commission
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 14, 1971PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBraucher, J.
The Rate Setting Commission (the commission) allowed the plaintiff nursing home a per diem rate of $10.46 for 1967 to be paid by various agencies of the Commonwealth. The plaintiff sought judicial review of the commission’s decision under G. L. c. 30A, § 14. The judge made rulings and an order for decree, and the final decree affirmed the decision of the commission. The plaintiff appeals under G. L. c. 30A, § 15.
Early in 1967, before opening, the plaintiff applied to the Board of Rate Setting for Convalescent or Nursing Homes and Rest Homes (the board) for the establishment of a per diem rate…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Druzik v. Board of Health of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Massachusetts General Hospital v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Springfield Hospital v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
- Massachusetts General Hospital v. Commissioner of AdministrationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cambridge Electric Light Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Massachusetts State Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. Rate Setting CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Greenleaf Finance Co. v. SMALL LOANS REGULATORY BOARDMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Medi-Cab of Massachusetts Bay, Inc. v. Rate Setting CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Quincy City Hospital v. RATE SETTING COMMISSIONMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.