First National Bank v. Montgomery
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPoeley, J.
Plaintiff recovered judgment on two promissory notes, and defendant- appeals.
In his answer defendant alleged, and at the trial put in evidence to prove, that the notes were procured from him' 'by means of gross falsehood, -misrepresentation, and deceit.. This allegation was in no way .disputed! by plaintiff, but plaintiff is an indorsee of the notes and claims that it is entitled to recover as a “holder in due course.” Defendant, among other defenses, contends that it does not appear from any evidence in the record that the notes were indorsed1 by any person having authority to indorse the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vickery v. BurtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Scotland County National Bank v. HohnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
- Spicer v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- State Bank of Alcester v. WeeksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
- State Bank v. WeeksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Bear Butte Valley BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934