Spicer v. Smith
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Eaton Circuit. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
This was assumpsit in which Smith declared against Spicer upon the common counts, and set forth the copy of a promissory note with a notice that the original would be given in evidence on the trial. The note and an indorsement were as follows:
*97“Postoffice address, Eaton Rapids, county of Eaton, state of Michigan, town of Hamlin, May 12, 1869.
“ $150.
“Five months after date, I promise to pay to the order of Perkins & Chilson, one hundred and fifty dollars, for value received, with use.
j “5 Cent ) ¿ Rev. Stamp.j
j 5 Cent ) j Rev. Stamp.j
“'(Signed) Frederick Seicer.”
(Indorsed on the back):
“Pay to…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Vickery v. BurtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Capitol Hill State Bank v. Rawlins National BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1916
- Gumaer v. SowersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
- State Bank of Alcester v. WeeksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
- Newton v. PrincipaalMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.