Legal Opinion

Bergseth v. Zinsmaster Baking Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 21, 1958No. 37,310Published

1DissentMurphy, Justice

I cannot agree that an employee, by virtue of his membership in a union which has entered into a pension agreement with his employer, has waived his rights to benefits under the unemployment compensation provisions of M. S. A. c. 268. The provisions of this chapter should be liberally construed so as to further its remedial and beneficent purposes. Nordling v. Ford Motor Co. 231 Minn. 68, 42 N. W. (2d) 576, 28 A. L. R. (2d) 272. The social policies which prompted the enactment of this legislation are set forth in § 268.03.

The majority opinion has adopted the narrower construction as expressed…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nordling v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Jackson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Northern National Bank v. Northern Minnesota National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Bingenheimer v. Diamond Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Mushel v. SchulzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API