Mushel v. Schulz
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Ramsey county by a resident and taxpayer of Benton county against the superintendent of education, the treasurer and auditor of the state of Minnesota to restrain defendant superintendent from executing any certificate of the amount to go to any schools for special state aid for the school year ending July 31, 1915, or that ending July 31, 1916, to make up any deficit for either of those years, and to restrain defendant auditor and treasurer…
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for Ramsey county by a resident and taxpayer of Benton county against the superintendent of education, the treasurer and auditor of the state of Minnesota to restrain defendant superintendent from executing any certificate of the amount to go to any schools for special state aid for the school year ending July 31, 1915, or that ending July 31, 1916, to make up any deficit for either of those years, and to restrain defendant auditor and treasurer from issuing or paying any warrant for the same-to be paid out of the appropriation made by the legislature for the…
1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.
1. Some years ago the state legislature adopted the policy of state aid to public schools which should attain certain prescribed standards. Statutes embodying this policy- have been passed by successive legislatures. G. S. 1913, §§ 2927-2948.
Chapter 296, p. 416, Laws 1915, contains the last modification of such statutes. It provides that schools of certain designated classes, upon reaching certain specified standards “shall receive” certain stipulated amounts annually from the state. These statutes created -an obligation on the part of the state to the-school districts meeting the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Seven Cases of Eckman's Alternative v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Funk v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Washed Sand & Gravel Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Connole v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1914
- Tucker v. WilliamsonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sevcik v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Bergseth v. Zinsmaster Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Bergseth v. Zinsmaster Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958