Legal Opinion
Schneider v. Bress
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 2, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Crew III, J.
Petitioners Martin B. Schneider and George G. Janis are attorneys employed by the State Division of Housing and Community Renewal; Schneider is employed as a senior attorney while Janis is employed as a Hearing Officer. As State employees earning in excess of $30,000 in 1989, petitioners were required to file an annual financial disclosure statement for calendar year 1988 in accordance with Public Officers Law § 73-a.* On or before April 1, 1989, petitioners applied to the State Ethics Commission for exemptions from the filing requirement in accordance with…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- 985 Fifth Avenue Inc. v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- John v. New York Ethics CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pallette Stone Corp. v. State Office of General ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Pallette Stone Corp. v. State of New York Office of General ServicesNew York Supreme Court · 1996
- Rubenfeld v. New York State Ethics CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007