Legal Opinion

Town of Windsor v. Village of DeForest

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 22, 2003No. 02-0281PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoggensack, J.

¶ 1. The Village of DeForest appeals judgment on the pleadings granted to the Town of Windsor, the Town of Burke and intervening plain tiffs, 1 declaring annexation ordinance 2001-10 void. DeForest ordinance 2001-10 purported to repeal an annexation ordinance enacted two months prior, ordinance 2000-69, and to re-annex largely the same territory as previously annexed. The circuit court held that ordinance 2001-10 was void because DeForest did not comply with the statutory requirements for changing municipal boundaries found in Wis. Stat. ch. 66. We agree that judgment on the pleadings was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. SetagordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Schuster v. AltenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Kelley Co., Inc. v. MarquardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Truttschel v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  5. Town of Madison v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mark McNally v. Capital Cartage, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Mark McNally v. Capital Cartage, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API