Legal Opinion
City of Amarillo v. Garwood
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 4, 1933No. 4173PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Justice.
In May, 1933, the city of Amarillo passed an ordinance affecting, certain persons who handled fruits and vegetables within its corporate limits. The ordinance in question consists of a preamble and eighteen sections. Of these we quote literally the following:
“Whereas, fruits and vegetables are now being sold at wholesale, within the limits of the City of Amarillo, which are inferior in quality, unfit for human consumption, mixed in grade, and sold as of a higher grade than represented. * * *
“Section 1. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation, to maintain and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- William Hoefling & Son v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Rosenfield v. SeifertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Mims v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- City of San Antonio v. TeagueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lewis v. Texas Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- City of Carthage v. AllumsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Thomas v. AllisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Brewer v. HeightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Nelson v. LambCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.