Legal Opinion
Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. v. Weissbard
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 31, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
19 N.J. Super. 210 (1952)
88 A.2d 238
HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MAX WEISSBARD AND HARRY WEISSBARD, INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS WEISSBARD BROS., DEFENDANTS.
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND McKESSON & ROBBINS, INCORPORATED, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CHARMLEY DRUG CO., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided March 31, 1952.
Mr. Joseph H. Stamler for the plaintiffs Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc., and Johnson & Johnson (Messrs.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Federal Trade Commission v. Beech-Nut Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- India Paint and Lacquer Co. v. United Steel Prod. Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Vornado, Inc. v. Corning Glass WorksDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1966
- Lionel Corp. v. Grayson-Robinson StoresNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953