Legal Opinion
Vornado, Inc. v. Corning Glass Works
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 20, 1966No. Civ. A. 723-63PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WORTENDYKE, District Judge.
The branch of this Court’s jurisdiction invoked in this case is alleged to rest upon 15 U.S.C. § 15. The plaintiff, a Kansas corporation, claims to have been injured in its business by reason of violations of the Anti-Trust Laws by the defendants. The defendant Lehrhoff resides in the District of New Jersey, Corning Glass Works (Corning), although a corporation of the State of New York, and H. Schultz & Sons (Schultz), a corporation of the State of New Jersey, are found and have agents in the District of New Jersey. The plaintiff (Vornado), although a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. Singer Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hudson Distributors, Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- General Electric Co. v. Kimball Jewelers, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- V. & L. Cicione, Inc. v. C. Schmidt & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- York & York Construction Co. v. AlexanderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Empire Excavating Co. v. Maret Development Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Frisch v. Victor Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- South Carolina Equipment, Inc. v. SheedyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.