Legal Opinion

Scott v. Francis

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 17, 1990No. A8412-07550; CA A46646PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*42BUTTLER, J.

Defendants Jackson and Lopez have filed petitions for review of our decision, 100 Or App 392, 786 P2d 1269 (1990), which we treat as petitions for reconsideration. ORAP 9.15. We deny Lopez’ petition, grant Jackson’s, modify our opinion, and reverse and remand.

In our original opinion, we agreed with the trial court in holding that Jackson’s claim for contractual indemnity failed, because the alleged promise to indemnify Jackson for any liability arising from his representation of Scott was made in November, 1981, after Jackson had already begun working on the case and had already…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bixler v. First Nat. Bank of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. Stevens v. Good Samaritan Hospital & Medical CenterOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Potter v. Hatter Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Atckison v. TriplettOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Scott v. FrancisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hill v. MayersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. Scott v. FrancisOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Eclectic Investment, LLC v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. Maurmann v. Del Morrow Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. Scott v. FrancisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API