Legal Opinion
State v. Anspach
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 8, 1984No. J81-2651, J81-2652; CA A25219Published
1Opinion of the Court
682 P.2d 786 (1984)
68 Or.App. 164
STATE of Oregon, Appellant-Cross-Respondent,
v.
Sally ANSPACH, Respondent-Cross-Appellant. State of Oregon, Appellant-Cross-Respondent,
v.
Matthew Anspach, Respondent-Cross-Appellant.
Nos. J81-2651, J81-2652; CA A25219.
Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.
Argued and Submitted March 14, 1983.
Resubmitted December 1, 1983.
Decided May 9, 1984.
Reconsideration Denied July 13, 1984.
Review Allowed August 8, 1984.
Stephen F. Peifer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With him on the briefs were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and William F.…
Also in this document: Dissent · Richardson; Dissent · Hoomissen.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.