Legal Opinion
Buchanan v. Crisler
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided February 22, 2018No. Docket No. 337720PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHoekstra, J.
In November 2016, petitioner, Stacia Buchanan, obtained an ex parte personal protection order (PPO) against respondent, John Crisler. Crisler filed a motion to terminate the PPO, and his motion was denied in March 2017. Crisler now appeals as of right the denial of his motion to terminate the PPO. For the reasons explained in this opinion, we vacate the trial court's order to the extent it relates to Crisler's online postings, and we remand for a determination of whether Crisler's posts violated MCL 750.411s(1). In all other respects, we affirm.
*890I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Buchanan is a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Virginia v. BlackSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Booth v. FinkDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024
- Hicks v. FarisDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
- Lindke v. LaneDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
- Lindke v. LaneDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- People of Michigan v. Jason Anthony SiegelMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.