Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Faris

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 30, 2024No. 1:20-cv-00680Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER HICKS, Case No. 1:20-cv-680 Plaintiff, McFarland, J. v. Bowman, M.J. D. VINCENT FARIS, et al., Defendants. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The above-captioned case was recently referred to the undersigned magistrate judge for consideration of three motions for summary judgment. In this Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), the undersigned recommends that the Court issue a declaratory judgment and preliminary injunction in favor of Plaintiff Hicks and against the Defendant Ohio Attorney General to preclude enforcement…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API