Legal Opinion

Stockton v. Hall

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 10, 1807PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*160Opinion Of the Cour/t. — On the 12th of Septem-1801, Samuel A. Hall sued out his capias, return-a|j¡e on the same day to the Fleming court of quarter sessl0ns> then m session, expressing m the body ol the writ, that he was assignee of William-Stockton, who was *161Assignee of Daniel Mullins, in covenant against George - Stockton, jr. The writ was endorsed as brought on a covenant for the delivery of S 40 worth of cattle. The declaration, after stating the covenant, &c. as executed by the defendant to Mullins, states the assignment there-bfby him to Stockton, on the 1st day of June Í8Ó1, and by…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. McGinnis v. McGinnis' Ex'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  2. Swope v. Central Greyhound LinesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  3. Fouts v. FoutsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API