Legal Opinion

Manhattan Savings Bank v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 8, 1977No. 7-76PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKunzig, Judge

This case, before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment, involves Manhattan Savings Bank’s (plaintiff or Manhattan) alleged liability for an adjusted insurance premium charge due upon the prepayment of a Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insured multifamily housing mortgage. At stake is approximately $36,000, the amount of the adjusted premium. Plaintiff does not contest the assessment of the premium; it is settled that the Government has the right to the money under 24 C.F.R. § 207.253(a)(l)(ii).1 At issue is plaintiffs liability for the assessment. Resolution of the question…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Selman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  2. S.W. Aircraft Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  3. The Martin Lane Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Henrietta D. v. BloombergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. City of Los Angeles v. DavidSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Lockheed Corporation v. Sheila E. Widnall, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  4. Suburban Mortgage Associates, Inc. v. United States Department Of Housing And Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  5. Henrietta v. BloombergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API