Legal Opinion

Clark v. Commisioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 13, 2021No. 3:20-cv-01008Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TAMMIE C.,1 Case No. 20-cv-01008-TSH 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR 9 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10 ANDREW SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 19, 21 11 Defendant. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff Tammie C. brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial 15 review of a final decision of Defendant Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, denying 16 Plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits. Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for 17 summary judgment. ECF Nos. 19 (Pl.’s Mot.), 21 (Def.’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API