Keen v. Eaby
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 338, Jan. T., 1915, by defendant, from judgment of C, P. Lancaster Co., August T., 1914, No. 53, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Clara L. Keen and Anna L. Myer v. Peter R. Eaby. Assumpsit against sur.ety to recover purchase-price of real estate.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 338, Jan. T., 1915, by defendant, from judgment of C, P. Lancaster Co., August T., 1914, No. 53, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Clara L. Keen and Anna L. Myer v. Peter R. Eaby. Assumpsit against sur.ety to recover purchase-price of real estate. The facts appear from the following opinion by Landis, P. J. : The instructions to the jury in this case were that, if they believed the evidence of the plaintiff, which was not in dispute, their verdict should be in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $2,470.70, and thereupon they rendered a verdict for the plaintjff for that…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This judgment is affirmed on the opinion of tfie learned president judge of tfie court below denying a new trial and refusing judgment for. tfie defendant non obstante veredicto.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Bosler v. Sun Oil CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Mylin v. HetrickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Wood v. EvanitzskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Byrne v. Williams, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Greene County1928
- In re Estate of WarnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.