Legal Opinion

Mylin v. Hetrick

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1923No. Appeal, 263PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, J.,

This is an action in assumpsit to recover damages for breach of covenants in a deed. The defendant deeded to the plaintiff a lot in the City of Lancaster known as No. 809 East Orange Street. The property was described as having a width of sixteen feet on East Orange Street with a depth of that width “one hundred and eight feet and six inches, more or less, to a fourteen feet wide common alley.” The actual depth of the lot was 100 feet on one side and one hundred and six on the other. The plaintiff claims that not only in the depth of the lot was there a discrepancy…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coughenour's Adm'rs v. StauftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  2. Keen v. EabySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Rodgers v. OlshoffskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  4. Smith v. DonahueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Albert v. Schenley Auto Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Byrne v. Williams, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Greene County1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API