Legal Opinion

Chuparkoff v. Migdal

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 2022No. 30034Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Chuparkoff v. Migdal,

2022-Ohio-3474.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) MARK CHUPARKOFF C.A. No. 30034 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE KIRK MIGDAL, et al. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF SUMMIT, OHIO Appellees CASE No. CV 2018-08-3526 DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY Dated: September 30, 2022 TEODOSIO, Presiding Judge. {¶1} Mark Chuparkoff appeals from the judgment of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment against him and dismissing his claims under the doctrine of collateral estoppel. We…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API