Legal Opinion

Thompson v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1965No. 38919PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeRbbet, J.

Although appellant, the city of Loveland, has discussed and alluded to numerous questions in its brief, the sole question presented by the record in its behalf is as follows: Can the city of Loveland levy an income tax on the wages of a resident, where such wages result from employment within another municipality and are subject to an income tax in that other municipality?

This court, through constitutional provisions and past decisions, is committed to certain legal principles in respect to the authority vested in municipalities to enact income taxes. Municipalities have the right to exercise…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Shaffer v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Lawrence v. State Tax Comm'n of Miss.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Ohio Ex Rel. Bryant v. Akron Metropolitan Park DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Angell v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Hillenmeyer v. Cleveland Board of ReviewOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co. v. CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Willacy v. Cleveland Bd. of Income Tax Rev. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Fisher v. NeusserOhio Supreme Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API