Legal Opinion
Williamson v. De Soto Wholesale Grocery Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 28, 1943No. 6655PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff brings this suit to recover damages for injuries sustained as the result of a collision between a truck in which plaintiff and a number of other persons, who are plaintiffs in companion cases, were riding, and a car owned and driven by one James Russell, a salesman employed by the De Soto Wholesale Grocery Company, Inc.
Most of the facts are undisputed and may be briefly summarized as follows:
Russell, employed as a salesman by the De Soto Wholesale Grocery Company, Inc., recklessly driving his personally-owned automobile at about 7:30 o'clock P.M. on September 11, 1941, negligently…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- James v. J. S. Williams & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- Warnick v. Louisiana Highway CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
- Silent Automatic Sales Corporation v. StaytonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Matheny v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
- Braud v. VinetLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rhea v. FarringtonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
- Ruth v. Royal Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
- Caldwell v. Unity Industrial Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1944
- The Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York v. Mrs. Claire B. Carpenter, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Stubblefield v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.