Legal Opinion

The Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York v. Mrs. Claire B. Carpenter, Etc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 3, 1956No. 15972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by the insurer from a judgment of the trial court based on a jury verdict in an action brought by an injured party directly against the insurer under the Louisiana direct action law. The basis of the appeal is appellant’s contention that the real tort feasor, one Hackett, was not an “insured” under the terms of the policy issued to Hackett’a employer, Rudolph Ramelli, Inc., and that at the time of the accident Hackett was not acting in the course and scope of his employment and the appellant’s named insured, Ramelli, thus had no vicarious liability…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Le Blanc v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  2. Cusimano v. A. S. Spiess Sales Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  3. James v. J. S. Williams & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  4. Linenschmidt v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  5. Warnick v. Louisiana Highway CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. LaneyMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Bruno v. American Employers InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. Government Employees InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API