Bibolova v. Radu
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The appeal from the order of protection, and the appeal from so much of the order of fact-finding and disposition as directed the appellant to observe the conditions of behavior specified in the order of protection for a period not to exceed 12 months, *1223have been rendered academic by the passing of the time limits contained therein (see Matter of Zieran v Marvin, 2 AD3d 870, 871-872 [2003]). Nevertheless, even though the order of protection has expired, “in light of the enduring consequences which may flow from an adjudication that a party has committed a family offense,” the appeal from so…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Creighton v. WhitmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Halper v. HalperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Wissink v. WissinkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Kravitz v. KravitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Rochester v. RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- King v. EdwardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Scioscia v. SciosciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Martinez v. AvilesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Daughtry A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Bonilla v. AcostaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.