Scioscia v. Scioscia
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Although the order of protection expired by its own terms on July 19, 2011, the appeal has not been rendered academic in light of the enduring consequences which may potentially flow *740from a finding that the appellant committed a family offense (see Matter of Willis v Rhinehart, 76 AD3d 641, 642 [2010]; Matter of Wallace v Wallace, 45 AD3d 599 [2007]; Matter of DeSouza-Brown v Brown, 38 AD3d 888 [2007]).
“The determination of whether a family offense was committed is a factual issue to be resolved by the Family Court, and that court’s determination regarding the credibility of witnesses is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Creighton v. WhitmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Kaur v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Wallace v. WallaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Yalvac v. YalvacAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Bibolova v. RaduAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Saldivar v. CabreraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Hohn v. GuirandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Samida v. SamidaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Martinez v. AvilesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of Rosenbloom v. RosenbloomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.