Legal Opinion

Doherty v. Bell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Erom the Parke Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

The appellants, as the assignees of one *206James B. Drake, sued the appellee in the court below, on a promissory note, bearing date the 20th day of June, 1872, and payable six months after date, at The First Rational Bank of Indianapolis, which was alleged to have been assigned before maturity.

The appellee answered in two paragraphs.

In the first paragraph the appellee charges, in substance, that, on the day on which said note bears date, one Harris, who represented himself as a general agent for the sale of “ Drake’s Horse Hay-Fork and Hay-Carrier,” in this State, came to his, appellee’s, house…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hefner v. VandolahIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Jaqua v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Ray v. McMurtryIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Meredith v. LackeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Hefner v. DawsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Tuttle v. StovallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Kingman & Co. v. StoddardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1898
  4. Bean v. BickleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  5. Tarkington v. PurvisIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API