Legal Opinion

Bowling v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 2, 1984No. 97, September Term, 1982PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

Under the circumstances of this case, we hold that the doctrine of collateral estoppel prevents the State from criminally trying the defendant on charges of sexual assault and related offenses when, in a prior civil proceeding based upon the same alleged incidents, the court dismissed the action on the ground that the State had failed to prove that the defendant had committed the acts.

On November 7,1981, Staci Lenee Bowling, then fourteen years old, went to the Charles County Sheriffs Department and alleged that, beginning in August 1981 and on other occasions thereafter, her…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Pulley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Neal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Bunting v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  2. Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Huffington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Ferrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API