Bowling v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ELDRIDGE, Judge.
Under the circumstances of this case, we hold that the doctrine of collateral estoppel prevents the State from criminally trying the defendant on charges of sexual assault and related offenses when, in a prior civil proceeding based upon the same alleged incidents, the court dismissed the action on the ground that the State had failed to prove that the defendant had committed the acts.
On November 7,1981, Staci Lenee Bowling, then fourteen years old, went to the Charles County Sheriffs Department and alleged that, beginning in August 1981 and on other occasions thereafter, her…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pulley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Neal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Bunting v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Huffington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Ferrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.