Legal Opinion
McCullough v. Kammerer Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 26, 1948No. 11122PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
McCullough appeals from an interlocutory decree holding that Kammerer Corporation, hereinafter called the patentee, is entitled to damages for McCullough’s infringement of patentee’s patents for cutting pipe in oil wells and an accounting thereof, and denying McCullough’s motion to set aside a prior interlocutory order for the accounting and to dismiss the two complaints (consolidated for trial) brought against him for such infringement by the patentee and Baash-Ross Tool Company, hereinafter called the licensee, on the ground that the licensing contract between the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- United States v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. Masonite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Finch v. Hughes Aircraft Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Hensley Equipment Company, Inc. v. Esco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Brownell, Atty. Gen v. Ketcham Wire & Mfg. CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Cutter Laboratories, Inc. v. Lyophile-Cryochem CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.