Legal Opinion

Kadlec v. Pavik

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Walsh County; Sauter, J. Action by John Kadlec against Frank Pavik. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBartholomew, C. J.

This is a contest over the office of village marshal in the Village of Pisek, in Walsh county. The election was held May 1, 1899, and a certificate of élection was duly issued to the contestee by the proper canvassing board. On the trial the court found the votes to be a tie, and ordered the cancellation of the certificate of election, and that the board of canvassers reconvene and cast lots, as the statutes direct in case of a tie. The contestee appeals.

Numerous errors are assigned and argued at length, but we shall *279confine ourselves to those which relate to the legality of the ballot cast…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hauenstein v. LynhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. People Ex Rel. Smith v. PeaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  3. Gilleland v. SchuylerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  4. Davis v. State ex rel. WrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  5. Gumm v. HubbardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sathre v. MoodieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Schillerstrom v. SchillerstromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Holgerson Ex Rel. Holgerson v. City of Devils LakeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Nelson v. GassNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Holtan v. BeckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API