Legal Opinion
Simpson v. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 22, 1920PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, District Judge.
The sharpness of'- the controversy, the fact that the testinlony was taken by deposition, the importance as asserted of the subject-matter in the shipbuilding art, and the several grounds upon which the patent is attacked have combined to require a consideration of all the substantial points raised. This opinion will therefore deal with more than is strictly necessary to a decision of the case, in order that litigants and counsel may have the court’s view, for whatever service they may be, in the event of appellate review.
“The present invention,” the patentee stated,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Steward v. American Lava Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- A. R. Mosler & Co. v. LurieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
- Richardson v. D. M. Osborne & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899
- Tompkins v. St. Regis Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Dwight & Lloyd Sintering Co. v. GreenawaltCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Gillons v. Shell Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Alliance Securities Co. v. De Vilbiss Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- American Safety Table Co. v. SchreiberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- American Safety Table Company, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee v. Joseph Schreiber and David Goldberg, Individually and as Partners Trading as Schreiber & Goldberg, Defendants-Appellees-Appellants. American Safety Table Company, Inc. v. Joseph Schreiber and David Goldberg, Individually and as Partners Trading as Schreiber & GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.