Legal Opinion

Chicago Lumber Co. v. Dillon

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1899No. 1565PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.

As assignee of Barnett & Troutman, who were contractors and builders, the Chicago Lumber Company brought this suit to enforce a mechanic’s lien which the contractors had filed on certain property in the city of Denver. Part of the title must be stated to show the origin of the claims of the contractors and to determine their right to proceed under the statute. As to some dates the record is' not complete. Prior to any of these dealings Mrs. Cordes was the owner of the lots. For the convenience of the parties Mrs. Cordes executed three deeds to Frank S. Woodbury and put them in escrow. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bear Lake & River Water Works & Irrigation Co. v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Shapleigh v. HullSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  3. Chicago Lumber Co. v. FretzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  4. Fechheimer v. TrounstieneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  5. Small v. FoleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sprague Investment Co. v. Mouat Lumber & Investment Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Tabor-Pierce Lumber Co. v. International Trust Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Jewel v. SaisColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Jewel v. SaisColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Sprague Investment Co. v. Mouat Lumber & Investment Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API