Legal Opinion

Webber v. Umback

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 11, 1928No. 27,508PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action to recover damages for breach of a contract of purchase and sale.

The facts were these: Defendant Umback purchased 100 hogs from plaintiff for $2,300. The hogs were to be selected from plaintiff’s herd of 150 or 160 head. Defendant came to plaintiff's farm in Ford county to select the hogs, and when he had chosen 53 of them he discovered that he had made a poor bargain — that there *118were not enough large hogs to make up the hundred he had purchased, so he rescinded the contract. Plaintiff thereupon shipped 100 of his largest…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Coleman v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. Evans v. MoseleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. State v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  4. Ray v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. Nelson v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Casey v. Phillips Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Sterling-Midland Coal Co. v. Great Lakes Coal & Coke Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1932
  3. Sonken-Galamba Corp. v. Butler Iron & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API