Legal Opinion
Hennessy v. Robinson
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided November 19, 1997No. 96-CV-1498PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM, DECISION and ORDER
HURD, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The attorney for the defendants Rob Robinson (“Robinson”) and Peter Servallo (“Servallo”) has moved pursuant to New York Public Officers Law, § 18(3)(c) for an order setting reasonable attorney’s fees to be paid by the defendant County of Oneida, New York (“County”). The County has opposed the motion. Oral argument was heard on October 11, 1997, in Utica, New York. Decision was reserved.
II. FACTS
In 1981, New York State enacted Public Officers Law § 18 (“ § 18”), providing in part that its provisions “shall apply…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Colon v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Eaton v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Corning v. Village of Laurel HollowNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Lloyd v. GrellaNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Coker v. City of SchenectadyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dayes v. Watertown City School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2021
- Dunn v. County of NiagaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corporation v. Fluor Daniel, Individually and as successor-in-interest to Fluor Engineers and Constructors, Inc.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2020