Legal Opinion

Oakland County v. Allen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1940No. Docket No. 36, Calendar No. 41,164PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

On May 8,1931, plaintiff had $128,000 on deposit in the Birmingham Savings Bank. Defendants, being directors of the bank, were sureties on a $65,000 bond given by the bank to secure repayment of plaintiff’s deposit of public funds as required by statute. 1 Comp. Laws 1929, §§ 1193-1202 (Stat. Ann. §§ 5.531-5.540). On December 16, 1931, the Birmingham Savings Bank entered into an agreement for the liquidation of its affairs by the First National Bank of Birmingham. Notice of this transaction was sent to all the Savings Bank depositors ; and on December 28, 1931, the transaction between the two…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. American Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Harrington-Wiard Co. v. Blomstrom Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. George Realty Co. v. Gulf Refining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Epworth Assembly v. Ludington & Northern RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Riber v. MorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. County of Hettinger v. TrousdaleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Thermo Electron Corp. v. Waste Management Holdings, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API