Legal Opinion

The Duro Co., Inc. v. Wishnevsky

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 4, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeher, J.

There was an interlocutory judgment by default upon a complaint charging that defendant had “willfully, maliciously and unlawfully removed * * * from the premises at Lexington and Main Street, Lakewood, New Jersey,” and had also “retained possession of,” certain goods sold and delivered by plaintiff to a third person under a conditional sales contract, whereby title was reserved to the •vendor pending the payment of the purchase price, and it was also agreed that, meanwhile, the goods should “be kept by the purchaser” at the premises aforesaid, “and not elsewhere, without the consent in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boyce v. . Greeley Square Hotel Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Fort Wayne & Wabash Valley Traction Co. v. JustusIndiana Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. LoBiondo v. SchwartzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  2. Winkler v. Hartford Acc. and Ind. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API