Freeman v. Herring Networks, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RUBY FREEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 21-3354 (BAH) RUDOLPH W. GIULIANI., Judge Beryl A. Howell Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorize “[l]iberal discovery” for the “sole purpose of assisting in the preparation and trial, or the settlement, of litigated disputes,” Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart,
467 U.S. 20, 34
(1984), with “the only express limitations [ ] that the information sought is not privileged, and is relevant to the subject matter of the pending action[,]” but without…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. ConnaughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm Beech David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm BeechCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.